李尊然;

• 1:中原工学院法学院

摘要(Abstract)：

投资协定大多仅对征收规定了补偿计算方法,而且将其僵硬地规定为资产被征收前一刻的公平市场价值。由于这一方法主观臆测性较强,易于造成重复计算或漏算,因此自晚近以来国际投资仲裁庭以及联合国赔偿委员会在包括征收在内的各种案件中越来越多地使用了实际投资和利润法,将公平市场价值法限制于公开市场下的合法征收。这一新方法在秉承市场理念的同时,更具确定性、充分性和灵活性,契合各国市场发达程度参差不齐的现状。实际上,这一方法也契合我国经济正处于市场化过程中的现状,对当前中美和中欧投资协定谈判和未来投资协定的签订有重要启示意义。

关键词(KeyWords)： 国际投资仲裁;补偿计算方法;实际损失;利润损失;公平市场价值

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金资助项目(12BFX141)

作者(Authors): 李尊然;

DOI: 10.16390/j.cnki.issn1672-0393.2015.01.020

参考文献(References)：

• 1 参见中华人民共和国商务部:《国别贸易投资环境报告2014》,http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/,2014-05-08。
• 2 See Ekran Berhad v.People’s Republic of China,ICSID Case No.ARB/11/15.
• 3 See Ping An Life Insurance Company of China,Limited and Ping An Insurance(Group)Company of China,Limited v.Kingdom of Belgium,ICSID Case No.ARB/12/29.
• 4 See United States v.Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.,229U.S.53,81(1913).
• 1 See Enron Corporation Ponderosa Assets,L.P v.Argentina,ICSID Case No.ARB/01/3,Award of 22May 2007;Starrett Housing Corporation v Iran,Iran-U.S.Claims Tribunal,Final Award No.314-24-1,Award of 14August 1987.
• 2 See International Glossary of Business Valuation Terms,American Society of Appraisers,ASA website,June 6,2001,p.4.
• 3 See World Bank,Legal Framework for the Treatment of Foreign Investment,Report to the Development Committee on the Treatment of Foreign Investment,31ILM 1363(1992).
• 4 例如,美国学者韦斯特贝格教授认为完全补偿标准在持续经营企业的情况下就变成了公平市价。See John A.Westberg,International Transactions and Claims Involving Government Parties:Case Law of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal,Washington DC:International Law Institute,1991,pp.213-214.
• 5 See Factory at Chorzów(Germany v.Poland),Permanent Court of International Justice,Judgment of 13September 1928.
• 6 See Phillips Petroleum Company Iran v.Iran and NIOC,Iran-U.S.Claims Tribunal,Award No.425-39-2,29June 1989.
• 7 See ADC v.Hungary,ICSID Case No.ARB/02/1,Final Award of 2October 2006.
• 8 See Amoco v.Iran,Iran-U.S.Claims Tribunal,Award of 14July 1987.
• 9 See American International Group,Inc.and American Life Insurance Company v.Iran,Iran-U.S.Claims Tribunal,Award No.93 -2-3,19December 1983.关于公平市价标准在合法与非法征收中的适用,参见李尊然:《国际投资争端解决中“公平的市场价值”补偿计算标准适用的限制》,载陈安主编:《国际经济法学刊》第20卷第2期,北京大学出版社2013年版,第104-110页。
• See Amco v.Indonesia II,ICSID Case No.ARB/81/8,Award on the Merits of 31 May 1990.
• See S.D.Myers,Inc.v.Canada,UNCITRAL,2nd Partial Award(Oct.21,2002).
• 1 See AAPL v.Sri Lanka,ICSID Case No.ARB/87/3,Final Award of 27June 1990.
• 2 See CMS v.Argentina,ICSID Case No.ARB/01/8,Final Award of 12 May 2005;Azurix Corp.v Argentina,ICSID Case No.ARB/01/12,Award of July 14,2006.
• 3 See BG v.Argentina,UNCITRAL,Award No.580-832-3,24December 2007.
• 4 See Vivian Mai Tavakoli v Iran,Iran-U.S.Claims Tribunal,Award of 23April 1997.
• 5 See Irmgard Barboe,Compensation in International Investment Arbitration,in Andrea K Bjorklund,Ian A Laird,and Sergey Ripinsky(eds),Investment Treaty Law Current Issue III:Remedies in International Investment Law:Emerging Jurisprudence in International Investment Law,London:British Institution of International and Comparative Law,2009,pp.34-36.
• 6 See Siag v.Egypt,ICSID Case No.ARB/05/15,Award of 1June 2009.
• 7 See World Bank,Legal Framework for the Treatment of Foreign Investment,Report to the Development Committee on the Treatment of Foreign Investment,31ILM 1363(1992).
• 8 清算价值法主要适用于企业破产或清算的情况,重置价值法主要适用于属于新资产或资产损耗率不大的情况。它们也不考虑企业作为整体的市场价值,因而在仲裁中使用很少,本文不予详细分析。
• 1 See Thomas R.Stauffer,Valuation of Assets in International Takings,17Energy L.J.459(1996).
• 2 See AMINOIL v.Kuwait,24 March 1982,Arbitration Tribunal,paras.146-153.
• 3 World Bank,Legal Framework for the Treatment of Foreign Investment,Report to the Development Committee on the Treatment of Foreign Investment,31ILM 1363(1992).
• 4 Simens v.Argentina,ICSID Case No.ARB/02/8,Award of 6Feb.2007.仲裁庭认为这一账面价值更应该被称为“沉没的投资成本”,因为没有计提折旧也不涉及西门子子公司的债务。
• 5 Bryan A Garner(ed.),Black’s Law Dictionary,7th ed.,St.Paul:West Group,pp.398-960.
• 6 参见杨良宜:《预期利益损失与依赖利益损失》,《中国海商法年刊》2011年第1期。
• 7 L.L.Fuller and W.R.Perdue,The Reliance Interest in Contract Damages,46Yale Law Journal 53(1936).
• 1 See Wells,Double Dipping in Arbitration Awards?,An Economist Questions Damages Awarded to Karaha Bodas Company in Indonesia,19Arb.Int.471(2003).
• 2 See Delagoa Bay Arbitration,H.La Fontaine,Pasicrise Internationale,1902,p.398.该案使用的术语是“实际利益损失”和“期待利益损失”。
• 3 See Sapphire v.National Iranian Oil Company,Ad Hoc Tribunal Award of 15 March 1963;Himpurna California Energy Ltd.v.Pt.Perusahaan Listruik Negara(Bermuda v.Indonesia),UNCITRAL,Final Award of 4 May 1999.对于有些案件,仲裁庭适用的是重置价值加利润损失方法。See Sedco,Inc.v.National Iranian Oil Company and The Islamic Republic of Iran,Iran-U.S.Claims Tribunal,Award of July 2,1987.
• 4 See CMS v.Argentina,ICSID Case No.ARB/01/8,Final Awards of 12 May 2005.
• 5 See Biloune and Marine Drive Complex Ltd v.Ghana Investment Centre,UNCITRAL,Award on Jurisdiction and Liability of 27October 1989,pp.211,228-229.
• 6 See Vivendi v.Argentina,ICSID Case No.ARB/97/3,Award of 20August 2007.
• 7 See Tecmed v.Mexico,ICSID Case No.ARB(AF)/00/2,Award of 29 May 2003.
• 1 See Andrea K Bjorklund,Ian A Laird,and Sergey Ripinsky(eds),Investment Treaty Law Current Issue III:Remedies in International Investment Law:Emerging Jurisprudence in International Investment Law,British Institution of International and Comparative Law,2009,p.49.
• 2 See Himpurna California Energy Ltd.v.Pt.Perusahaan Listruik Negara(Bermuda v.Indonesia),UNCITRAL,Final Award of May 1999.
• 3 杨良宜:《预期利益损失与依赖利益损失》,《中国海商法年刊》2011年第1期。
• 4 McRae v.Commonwealth Disposals Commission(1951)84C.L.R.377
• 5 See Biwater Gauff(Tanzania)Ltd.v.Tanzania,ICSID Case No.ARB/05/22,Award and Concurring Opinion,paras.795-807.
• 1 参见联合国赔偿委员会:《专员小组就第一批“E4”类索赔提出的报告和建议》,S/AC.26/1999/4(1999),第146-148段。
• 2 Asian Agriculture Products Ltd.v.Republic of Sri lanka,ICSID Case No.ARB/87/3,Final Award of June 27,1990.
• 3 参见联合国赔偿委员会:《在贸易禁运措施和有关措施是商业损失的一个原因的情况下赔偿伊拉克非法入侵和占领科威特所造成的商业损失》,S/AC.26/1992/15,1993年1月4日,第7段。
• 4 See Maritime International Nominees Establishment(MINE)v.Republic of Guinea,ICSID Case No.ARB/84/4,Award of January 6,1998.
• 5 See Robert B.Dickie,Financial Statement Analysis and Business Valuation for the Practical Lawyer,2nd ed.,Business Law Section,American Bar Association,2006,p.284.
• 6 See Shannon,P.Pratt,The Lawyer’s Business Valuation Handbook,American Bar Association,2000,p.114.
• 1 See Andrea K Bjorklund,Ian A Laird,and Sergey Ripinsky,and Sergey Ripinsky(eds),Investment Treaty Law Current Issue III:Remedies in International Investment Law:Emerging Jurisprudence in International Investment Law,British Institution of International and Comparative Law,2009,p.49.
• 2 See Amco v.IndonesiaⅡ,ICSID Case No.ARB/81/8/,Award on the Merits of May 1990.